Risk Factors and Interpretation of Inconclusive Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
Background: The inconclusive cytological findings of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) remain a major clinical challenge and often lead to treatment delays. Methods: Patients who had undergone EUS-FNA sampling for solid pancreas lesions between 2014 and 2021 were retrospe...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerzők: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Cikk |
| Megjelent: |
2023
|
| Sorozat: | DIAGNOSTICS
13 No. 17 |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| doi: | 10.3390/diagnostics13172841 |
| mtmt: | 34129891 |
| Online Access: | http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/28219 |
| LEADER | 03026nab a2200373 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | publ28219 | ||
| 005 | 20230910175452.0 | ||
| 008 | 230910s2023 hu o 0|| Angol d | ||
| 022 | |a 2075-4418 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/diagnostics13172841 |2 doi | |
| 024 | 7 | |a 34129891 |2 mtmt | |
| 040 | |a SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium |b hun | ||
| 041 | |a Angol | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bor Renáta | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Risk Factors and Interpretation of Inconclusive Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions |h [elektronikus dokumentum] / |c Bor Renáta |
| 260 | |c 2023 | ||
| 300 | |a 16 | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a DIAGNOSTICS |v 13 No. 17 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a Background: The inconclusive cytological findings of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) remain a major clinical challenge and often lead to treatment delays. Methods: Patients who had undergone EUS-FNA sampling for solid pancreas lesions between 2014 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. The “atypical” and “non-diagnostic” categories of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System were considered inconclusive and the “negative for malignancy” category of malignancy was suspected clinically. We determined the frequency and predictors of inconclusive cytological finding. Results: A total of 473 first EUS-FNA samples were included, of which 108 cases (22.83%) were inconclusive. Significant increases in the odds of inconclusive cytological findings were observed for lesions with a benign final diagnosis (OR 11.20; 95% CI 6.56–19.54, p < 0.001) as well as with the use of 25 G FNA needles (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.09–4.01, p = 0.023) compared to 22 G needles. Furthermore, the use of a single EUS-FNA technique compared to the combined use of slow-pull and standard suction techniques (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.06–2.70, p = 0.027) and less than three punctures per procedure led to an elevation in the risk of inconclusive cytology (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.49–4.14, p < 0.001). Risk reduction in inconclusive cytology findings was observed in lesions between 2–4 cm (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.23–0.68, p = 0.001) and >4 cm (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.08–0.31, p < 0.001) compared to lesions ≤2 cm. Conclusions: The more than two punctures per EUS-FNA sampling with larger-diameter needle (19 G or 22 G) using the slow-pull and standard suction techniques in combination may decrease the probability of inconclusive cytological findings. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gasztroenterológia és hepatológia | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Onkológia | |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Vasas Béla |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Fábián Anna |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Szűcs Mónika |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Bősze Zsófia |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Bálint Anita |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Rutka Mariann |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Farkas Klaudia |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Tóth Tibor |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Resál Tamás |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Bacsur Péter |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Molnár Tamás |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Szepes Zoltán |e aut |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/28219/1/diagnostics-13-02841-v2.pdf |z Dokumentum-elérés |