Are Migraine With and Without Aura Really Different Entities?

Background: Migraine research is booming with the rapidly developing neuroimaging tools. Structural and functional alterations of the migrainous brain were detected with MRI. The outcome of a research study largely depends on the working hypothesis, on the chosen measurement approach and also on the...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerzők: Kincses Zsigmond Tamás
Veréb Dániel
Faragó Péter
Tóth Eszter
Kocsis Krisztián
Kincses Bálint
Király András
Bozsik Bence
Párdutz Árpád
Szok Délia
Tajti János
Vécsei László
Tuka Bernadett
Szabó Nikoletta
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2019
Sorozat:FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY 10
doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00982

mtmt:30912142
Online Access:http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/17938
Leíró adatok
Tartalmi kivonat:Background: Migraine research is booming with the rapidly developing neuroimaging tools. Structural and functional alterations of the migrainous brain were detected with MRI. The outcome of a research study largely depends on the working hypothesis, on the chosen measurement approach and also on the subject selection. Against all evidence from the literature that migraine subtypes are different, most of the studies handle migraine with and without aura as one disease. Methods: Publications from PubMed database were searched for terms of “migraine with aura,” “migraine without aura,” “interictal,” “MRI,” “diffusion weighted MRI,” “functional MRI,” “compared to,” “atrophy” alone and in combination. Conclusion: Only a few imaging studies compared the two subforms of the disease, migraine with aura, and without aura, directly. Functional imaging investigations largely agree that there is an increased activity/activation of the brain in migraine with aura as compared to migraine without aura. We propose that this might be the signature of cortical hyperexcitability. However, structural investigations are not equivocal. We propose that variable contribution of parallel, competing mechanisms of maladaptive plasticity and neurodegeneration might be the reason behind the variable results. © Copyright © 2019 Kincses, Veréb, Faragó, Tóth, Kocsis, Kincses, Király, Bozsik, Párdutz, Szok, Tajti, Vécsei, Tuka and Szabó.
Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők:Azonosító: 982-Terjedelem: 6 p
ISSN:1664-2295