A phase 1b/2b multicenter study of oral panobinostat plus azacitidine in adults with MDS, CMML or AML with ⩽30% blasts

Treatment with azacitidine (AZA), a demethylating agent, prolonged overall survival (OS) vs conventional care in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). As median survival with monotherapy is <2 years, novel agents are needed to improve outcomes. This phase 1b/2b trial (n=113)...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerzők: Garcia-Manero Guillermo
Sekeres Mikkael A.
Egyed Miklós
Breccia Massimo
Graux Carlos
Cavenagh Jamie D.
Salman Huda S.
Illés Árpád
Fénaux Pierre
DeAngelo Daniel J.
Stauder Reinhard
Yee Karen W.L
Zhu Nancy Y.
Lee Jae-hoon
Borbényi Zita
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2017
Sorozat:LEUKEMIA 31
doi:10.1038/leu.2017.159

mtmt:3279788
Online Access:http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/16998
Leíró adatok
Tartalmi kivonat:Treatment with azacitidine (AZA), a demethylating agent, prolonged overall survival (OS) vs conventional care in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). As median survival with monotherapy is <2 years, novel agents are needed to improve outcomes. This phase 1b/2b trial (n=113) was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of panobinostat (PAN)+AZA (phase 1b) and evaluate the early efficacy and safety of PAN+AZA vs AZA monotherapy (phase 2b) in patients with higher-risk MDS, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia with <30% blasts. The MTD was not reached; the RP2D was PAN 30 mg plus AZA 75 mg/m2. More patients receiving PAN+AZA achieved a composite complete response ([CR)+morphologic CR with incomplete blood count+bone marrow CR (27.5% (95% CI, 14.6-43.9%)) vs AZA (14.3% (5.4-28.5%)). However, no significant difference was observed in the 1-year OS rate (PAN+AZA, 60% (50-80%); AZA, 70% (50-80%)) or time to progression (PAN+AZA, 70% (40-90%); AZA, 70% (40-80%)). More grade 3/4 adverse events (97.4 vs 81.0%) and on-treatment deaths (13.2 vs 4.8%) occurred with PAN+AZA. Further dose or schedule optimization may improve the risk/benefit profile of this regimen.Leukemia advance online publication, 14 July 2017; doi:10.1038/leu.2017.159.
Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők:2799-2806
ISSN:0887-6924