Ability of Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1, and S100B to Differentiate Normal and Abnormal Head Computed Tomography Findings in Patients with Suspected Mild or Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury.

Head Computed Tomography (CT) imaging is still a commonly obtained diagnostic test for patients with minor head injury despite availability of clinical decision rules to guide imaging use and recommendations to reduce radiation exposure resulting from unnecessary imaging. This prospective multi-cent...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerzők: Welch Robert D.
Ayaz Syed I.
Lewis Lawrence M.
Unden Johan
Chen James Y.
Mika Valerie H.
Saville Ben
Tyndall Joseph A.
Nash Marshall
Büki András
Barzó Pál
Hack Dallas
Tortella Frank C.
Schmid Kara
Hayes Ronald L.
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2016
Sorozat:JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA 33 No. 2
doi:10.1089/neu.2015.4149

mtmt:2966551
Online Access:http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/16628
Leíró adatok
Tartalmi kivonat:Head Computed Tomography (CT) imaging is still a commonly obtained diagnostic test for patients with minor head injury despite availability of clinical decision rules to guide imaging use and recommendations to reduce radiation exposure resulting from unnecessary imaging. This prospective multi-center observational study of 251 patients with suspected mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) evaluated three serum biomarkers' (Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein [GFAP], Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 [UCH-L1] and S100B measured within 6-hours of injury) ability to differentiate CT negative and CT positive findings. Of the 251 patients, 60.2% were male and 225 (89.6%) had a presenting Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15. A positive head CT (intracranial injury), was found in 36 (14.3%). UCH-L1 was 100% sensitive and 39% specific at a cutoff value > 40 pg/ml. To retain 100% sensitivity, GFAP was 0% specific (cutoff value 0 pg/ml) and S100B had a specificity of only 2% (cutoff value 30 pg/ml). All three biomarkers had similar values for areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve; 0.79 (95% CI; 0.70 to 0.88) for GFAP, 0.80 (0.71 to 0.89) for UCH-L1, and 0.75 (0.65 to 0.85) for S100B. Neither GFAP nor UCH-L1 curve values differed significantly from S100B (p=0.21 and p=0.77 respectively). In our patient cohort, UCH-L1 outperformed GFAP and S100B when the goal was to reduce CT use without sacrificing sensitivity. UCH-L1 values < 40 pg/ml could potentially have aided in eliminating 83 of the 215 negative CT scans. These results require replication in other studies before the test is used in actual clinical practice.
Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők:203-214
ISSN:0897-7151