Subsidiarity and proportionality in Public Works' administration from local, regional, and national to inter-regional, cross-border/transnational, Trans-European Networks (TENTs) in Transylvania belonging to Hungary (until 1918/20) and to Romania (since 1918/1920) /
This study intends to identify those levels of public sphere at which the public choice seems to be optimal, according to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, and depending on the scale of public works investments and the historical period, legal context. 20th century Transylvania – w...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Cikk |
| Megjelent: |
Belvedere Meridionale
Szeged
2024
|
| Sorozat: | Belvedere Meridionale
36 No. 1 |
| Kulcsszavak: | Közigazgatás |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| doi: | 10.14232/belv.2024.1.8 |
| Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/85132 |
| Tartalmi kivonat: | This study intends to identify those levels of public sphere at which the public choice seems to be optimal, according to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, and depending on the scale of public works investments and the historical period, legal context. 20th century Transylvania – with an area that could comprise in it twice the Belgium’s and one whole Netherlands – being part consecutively of Austria-Hungary, Romania, Hungary (its Northern part) and again Romania (since 1947 People’s Republic of Romania) is a good terrain to analyze in the long term the specificities of public administration, public-private investments and the efficiency of public works in different time periods on local, regional and country level, continuing with the comparison of cross-border, trans- and international level public works based on public procurement. The durability and warrant of final product as public goods are also an actual topic, mainly because most of these public goods and historic public buildings approach their lifetime limits and need urgent restoration, nowadays their renovation frequently being financed by the local and state authorities with funds from the European Union’s Cohesion or Regional Development Funds. According to a classic Romanian public law and accountability law principle (local-regional) cooperatives had certain facilities in being involved in implementing public works on (local-regional) level without breach in the general law of competition. Based on the local roots of any cooperative and their ideal functioning according to universal principles (democratic structure, delegation of votes, autonomy inside a network or a hierarchical structure with their own supervising and coordinating non-lucrative offices, together with proper financial centers), it was a general rule and many parts in the world it still works as such, except for the neo capitalist oriented former East-Central Europe, where all the preexisting cooperative structures were dismantled and there are no countervailing powers or checks and balances on this market of public works. The historical examples (in a comparative Romanian-Hungarian or Transylvanian Saxon) will surely help in understanding the logic of public procurement policies and investments, works and the efficiency of realizing/ creating public goods. |
|---|---|
| Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők: | 102-130 |
| ISSN: | 2064-5929 |