Gondolatok a végrehajtási jog elévüléséről
The passage of time has a varied effect on civil claims, in some cases it results in loss of rights, in others it results in statute of limitations, and there are also claims that are not time-barred at all. Act LIII of 1994 on Judicial Enforcement does not contain its own rules in Paragraph 57, if...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Cikk |
| Megjelent: |
2023
|
| Sorozat: | Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : forum : acta juridica et politica
13 No. 2 |
| Kulcsszavak: | Végrehajtási eljárás - polgári jog |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/84494 |
| Tartalmi kivonat: | The passage of time has a varied effect on civil claims, in some cases it results in loss of rights, in others it results in statute of limitations, and there are also claims that are not time-barred at all. Act LIII of 1994 on Judicial Enforcement does not contain its own rules in Paragraph 57, if only because of its procedural nature, it refers back to substantive rules. The present study does not aim to explore the dogmatic basis of statute of limitations but has already been monographically processed in relation to private statute of limitations. The rules set out in Section 57 of the Judicial Enforcement Act have not changed since the Act came into force, yet the analysis of the related court case law makes the examination of this issue topical from time to time, and the procedure to be followed in the event of limitation of enforcement rights and the method of regulation are still debated to this day. The aim of the study is to present new court cases related to the limitation of enforcement rights and to answer questions surrounding the procedure governing the limitation of enforcement rights. |
|---|---|
| Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők: | 77-87 |
| ISSN: | 2063-2525 |