A magyar földbirtok-politikai célkitűzések gyakorlati érvényesülése
After the change of regime, the Hungarian land holding structure was significantly fragmented, which negatively affected agricultural productivity. The Hungarian rules of land transaction have been extensively amended after joining the European Union, but one of the most important agricultural and l...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Cikk |
| Megjelent: |
2022
|
| Sorozat: | Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : forum : publicationes doctorandorum juridicorum
12 |
| Kulcsszavak: | Földbirtokpolitika - Magyarország - 1990-es évek, Agrárpolitika - Magyarország - 1990-es évek, Jogtörténet - magyar |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/82489 |
| Tartalmi kivonat: | After the change of regime, the Hungarian land holding structure was significantly fragmented, which negatively affected agricultural productivity. The Hungarian rules of land transaction have been extensively amended after joining the European Union, but one of the most important agricultural and land policy objectives remains the resolution of issues arising from the fragmented land structure (e.g. the disorganised nature of the real estate registration). Nowadays, the unresolved land structure creates numerous legal, administrative and economic problems, which is why several pieces of land legislation have identified the settlement of existing landownership as a goal to be achieved. These problems affect both landowners and land users, as well as legal practitioners in a broad sense. By creating the rules of land transaction in force, the legislator has created indirect instruments (e.g. system of the right of pre-emption, local land commission’s resolution) to achieve the legislative objectives, but the judicial interpretation of these legal institutions cannot be considered uniform. Constitutional concerns have been raised on several occasions regarding the exercise of right of pre-emption and the operation and resolution of the local land commission. The objectives of land policy are not only addressed through indirect instruments, but they also appear directly in judicial practice, as they can form the basis of specific court decisions. The present study aims to illustrate the practical implementation of certain land policy objectives, in particular the objective of settling the fragmented land structure. The author's preliminary hypothesis is that, in the judicial practice, there is no uniformity in the interpretation of land policy objectives, and therefore the practical implementation of these objectives is presented through the analysis of individual court decisions. |
|---|---|
| Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők: | 5-20 |
| ISSN: | 2063-5540 |