A kettős állampolgárság kapcsán felmerülő dogmatikai kérdések a dualizmus közjogában
Members of Parliament formed their opinions regarding dual citizenship in accordance with the political system of dual monarchy. As a general principle it was accepted that the emergence of dual citizenship should be prevented by any means possible, in which effort a major tool was the institution o...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Cikk |
| Megjelent: |
Szegedi Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Karának tudományos bizottsága
Szeged
2010
|
| Sorozat: | Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : acta juridica et politica
73 No. 1-64 |
| Kulcsszavak: | Közjog - magyar - 19. sz., Jogtörténet - magyar - 19. sz., Kettős állampolgárság |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/7487 |
| Tartalmi kivonat: | Members of Parliament formed their opinions regarding dual citizenship in accordance with the political system of dual monarchy. As a general principle it was accepted that the emergence of dual citizenship should be prevented by any means possible, in which effort a major tool was the institution of dismissal from citizenship. The AustroHungarian Monarchy had no joint citizenship. The interpretation of the original text of the draft bill would have facilitated the transformation of the "real union" between Austria and Hungary into an even closer alliance by way of creating joint citizenship, which would have involved a further narrowing down of state sovereignty. There was no Croatian citizenship, since citizenship was "one and the same" in the countries of the Hungarian crown. |
|---|---|
| Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők: | 905-925 |
| ISSN: | 0324-6523 |