Restauráció, reform vagy újjáépítés az alapokról? katolikus államreform-elképzelések a két világháború között /

After a year and a half after the end of the First World War, which was dominated by serious crisis in all respects, it was clear in Hungarian political life that a simple return to the „happy times of peace” known before 1914 was almost impossible. It was clear to the responsible political leadersh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zachar Péter Krisztián
Format: Article
Published: Egyesület Közép-Európa Kutatására, Szegedi Tudományegyetem Juhász Gyula Pedagógusképző Kar Szeged 2020
Series:Közép-európai közlemények 13 No. 3
Kulcsszavak:Magyarország története - 20. sz., Horthy-korszak
Subjects:
Online Access:http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/71803
Description
Summary:After a year and a half after the end of the First World War, which was dominated by serious crisis in all respects, it was clear in Hungarian political life that a simple return to the „happy times of peace” known before 1914 was almost impossible. It was clear to the responsible political leadership that the pre-existing political, economic and social problems, which were exacerbated by the crisis of Hungarian statehood between 1918 and 1920, had to be remedied. The period of the disintegration of historical Hungary was characterized by the complete instability of the political system, therefor some democratic elements of this era proved to be a mistake and had to be eliminated in the future for the Christian-conservative narrative. At the same time in the Christian-conservative camp, which gradually came to power from the late autumn of 1919, however, there was no consensus on the number of parameters to be changed, selected on a moving scale between total restoration and profound modernization as a function of individual ideology and beliefs. In addition to the conservative trend that came to power, the political group marked by the name of István Bethlen, there was also a more conservative, but at the same time progressive, Christian social opposition that called for complete reconstruction. The conservative Catholic thinkers of the era, on whom this study focuses, were convinced that a new state system could get rid of the „liberalist” conception of the state and at the same time the „total state” embodied in the era by Bolshevism (the reign of a lived and real Soviet republic in 1919 in Hungary). For them, true democracy did not mean mass democracy, but rather compromise and balance of interests on a more abstract, theoretically higher level, and therefore rejected the legitimacy of multi-party parliamentarism. As an alternative to this, they argued for a new system of vocational orders based on solidarity and subsidiarity, and sought to defend their own concept and the Hungarian state of the future against both unbridled libertarian and inherently threatening totalitarian ideas. All along, they stood for subsidiarity, „organic democracy,” and a private economy backed by corrections, believing that state reform, coupled with government support and societal insight, could succeed. The present study seeks to draw the political theoretical background of this reconstruction concept.
Physical Description:157-180
ISSN:1789-6339