Bogdán Hmelnyickij és Iván Mazepa megítélésének összeasonlító vizsgálata a 17-18. századtól napjainkig

The perception of Bogdán Khmelnytsky’s character and political aspirations has been constantly changing over the centuries, but, with very few exceptions, the Ukrainian and Russian-Soviet historiography have drawn a positive image o f his historical role. Bogdán Khmelnytsky is one of the few histori...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerző: Varga Beáta
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2018
Sorozat:Hungaro-Ruthenica 8
Kulcsszavak:Bogdán Hmelnyickij, Ivan Mazeppa, Ukrajna története - 17-18. sz., Kozákok története
Online Access:http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/63228
LEADER 01754nab a2200193 i 4500
001 acta63228
005 20210709120222.0
008 200129s2018 hu o 0|| zxx d
022 |a 1586-0736 
040 |a SZTE Egyetemi Kiadványok Repozitórium  |b hun 
041 |a zxx 
100 1 |a Varga Beáta 
245 1 0 |a Bogdán Hmelnyickij és Iván Mazepa megítélésének összeasonlító vizsgálata a 17-18. századtól napjainkig  |h [elektronikus dokumentum] /  |c  Varga Beáta 
260 |c 2018 
300 |a 157-172 
490 0 |a Hungaro-Ruthenica  |v 8 
520 3 |a The perception of Bogdán Khmelnytsky’s character and political aspirations has been constantly changing over the centuries, but, with very few exceptions, the Ukrainian and Russian-Soviet historiography have drawn a positive image o f his historical role. Bogdán Khmelnytsky is one of the few historical figures who is considered to have a legitimate personality in both the “nationalist” and the “Soviet-type” Ukrainian identity. Such a unified picture has not developed about the historical role of Iván Mazepa. In the post 1991 historiography of Ukraine, we can witness the “renaissance” of the “national” and the Ukrainian emigrant school of historiography, marked by “Hrushevsky”. At the same time the myth of Mazepa as the “Symbol of treachery” which was a characteristic of the 18Л-2 0 Л century Russian and Soviet historiography, practically migrated, transferred to contemporary Russian historiography, where it still remains a less preferred research topic. 
695 |a Bogdán Hmelnyickij, Ivan Mazeppa, Ukrajna története - 17-18. sz., Kozákok története 
856 4 0 |u http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/63228/1/hungaro_ruthenica_008_157-172.pdf  |z Dokumentum-elérés