Bogdán Hmelnyickij és Iván Mazepa megítélésének összeasonlító vizsgálata a 17-18. századtól napjainkig
The perception of Bogdán Khmelnytsky’s character and political aspirations has been constantly changing over the centuries, but, with very few exceptions, the Ukrainian and Russian-Soviet historiography have drawn a positive image o f his historical role. Bogdán Khmelnytsky is one of the few histori...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Cikk |
| Megjelent: |
2018
|
| Sorozat: | Hungaro-Ruthenica
8 |
| Kulcsszavak: | Bogdán Hmelnyickij, Ivan Mazeppa, Ukrajna története - 17-18. sz., Kozákok története |
| Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/63228 |
| Tartalmi kivonat: | The perception of Bogdán Khmelnytsky’s character and political aspirations has been constantly changing over the centuries, but, with very few exceptions, the Ukrainian and Russian-Soviet historiography have drawn a positive image o f his historical role. Bogdán Khmelnytsky is one of the few historical figures who is considered to have a legitimate personality in both the “nationalist” and the “Soviet-type” Ukrainian identity. Such a unified picture has not developed about the historical role of Iván Mazepa. In the post 1991 historiography of Ukraine, we can witness the “renaissance” of the “national” and the Ukrainian emigrant school of historiography, marked by “Hrushevsky”. At the same time the myth of Mazepa as the “Symbol of treachery” which was a characteristic of the 18Л-2 0 Л century Russian and Soviet historiography, practically migrated, transferred to contemporary Russian historiography, where it still remains a less preferred research topic. |
|---|---|
| Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők: | 157-172 |
| ISSN: | 1586-0736 |