Húsz év múltán redmények és problémák az Alföld 9. századi történetének kutatásában /
The largest scale review of the 9th century history of the Great Hungarian Plain was carried out more than twenty years ago (Szeged, 1993). In this paper we made an attempt to overview the results of the intervening decades, regarding to both the results of the historiography using written sources,...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Testületi szerző: | |
| Dokumentumtípus: | Könyv része |
| Megjelent: |
2017
|
| Sorozat: | Monográfiák a Szegedi Tudományegyetem Régészeti Tanszékéről
Az Alföld a 9. században II. |
| Kulcsszavak: | Régészet - avarok - Kárpát-medence - 7-10. sz., Kárpát-medence népei - 7-10. sz. |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/62696 |
| Tartalmi kivonat: | The largest scale review of the 9th century history of the Great Hungarian Plain was carried out more than twenty years ago (Szeged, 1993). In this paper we made an attempt to overview the results of the intervening decades, regarding to both the results of the historiography using written sources, as well as the actual conclusions of archaeology using relics. Thus, we considered the studies as basis, written by historians Samu Szádeczky-Kardoss, Terézia Olajos, György Szabados or by archaeologists Éva Garam, Attila Katona-Kiss, Gabriella M. Lezsák, János Makkay, László Révész, Csaba Szalontai, János Győző Szabó, Béla Miklós Szőke and József Szentpéteri. We analysed the ‘Szarvas–Kákapuszta and Tiszafüred–Majoroshalom phenomena’, that are the fundamental syndromes of the research of that era. The analysis of these two sites, and the conclusions drawn from them have been present in the literature as irrefutable axioms up to now. According to the above mentioned historical and archaeological data, we have to count with the survival of the Avars, who lived there before in the central areas of the Great Hungarian Plain, i.e. high number of the Avars survived the Hungarian Conquest at the end of the century, and became part of the Hungarian ethnogenesis. I had my reservations voiced earlier about that in my papers (Madaras 1991, 1993, 2012), and, in my opinion, these reservations have been further strengthened. Significant presence of the Bulgarians and the Slavs in the Great Hungarian Plain in the 9th century cannot be archaeologically justified after the publication of the papers by Csaba Szalontai and Attila Katona-Kiss, neither burials nor settlements of these people can be found in this area. Unfortunately, the same can be said about the population characterized by objects of the griffin-tendril culture. The youngest graves of the griffin-tendril cemeteries are no older than the first decades of the 9th century as belt sets and women’s jewellery evidence. In the last third of our paper we tried to give an answer to the question, how the situation could evolve that prior to the Hungarian Conquest of nearly half a century a political and ethnic vacuum arose. We do not claim that this is the only solution, but we think that it is another possibility. |
|---|---|
| Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők: | 9-25 |
| ISBN: | 978-963-306-555-6 |
| ISSN: | 2062-9877 |