Automation in action Experience with quick and cost-efficient administrative decisions in Hungary /

Automated decision-making can streamline administrative procedures, reducing the burden on authorities in straightforward cases. However, a concerning trend emerges: negative decisions challenged by clients are often so simplified that they render judicialreview meaningless, leaving issues unresolve...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerző: Csatlós Erzsébet
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2025
Sorozat:BALKAN SOCIAL SCIENCE REVIEW (BSSR) 25 No. 25
Tárgyszavak:
doi:10.46763/BSSR252525181c

mtmt:36226811
Online Access:http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/37222
LEADER 01943nab a2200217 i 4500
001 publ37222
005 20250710151931.0
008 250710s2025 hu o 000 eng d
022 |a 1857-8772 
024 7 |a 10.46763/BSSR252525181c  |2 doi 
024 7 |a 36226811  |2 mtmt 
040 |a SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium  |b hun 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Csatlós Erzsébet 
245 1 0 |a Automation in action  |h [elektronikus dokumentum] :  |b Experience with quick and cost-efficient administrative decisions in Hungary /  |c  Csatlós Erzsébet 
260 |c 2025 
300 |a 181-202 
490 0 |a BALKAN SOCIAL SCIENCE REVIEW (BSSR)  |v 25 No. 25 
520 3 |a Automated decision-making can streamline administrative procedures, reducing the burden on authorities in straightforward cases. However, a concerning trend emerges: negative decisions challenged by clients are often so simplified that they render judicialreview meaningless, leaving issues unresolved. This is not merely a technical issue but a constitutional one. Clients are frequently deprived of meaningful reasoning, procedural safeguards, and effective legal remedies. Administrative decisions should uphold legality and transparency, ensuring fair proceedings. When a decision lacks proper justification and courts cannot assess its legality, it becomes unsuitable for review, undermining due process. If automation leads to decisions lacking transparency and accountability, it threatens fundamental legal principles.This study aims to show how automated -decision making is done in practice and what legal problems has emerged already by exploring casefiles and judicial decisions to highlight the risks of automated decision-making and calls for a balanced approach to maintain efficiency while safeguarding constitutional rights and judicial oversight. 
650 4 |a Jogtudomány 
856 4 0 |u http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/37222/1/Csatlos_AutomationinActionBSSR2025.pdf  |z Dokumentum-elérés