Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis /

Objectives Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in individual studies. Methods...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerzők: Lyubenova Anita
Neupane Dipika
Levis Brooke
Wu Yin
Sun Ying
He Chen
Krishnan Ankur
Bhandari Parash M.
Negeri Zelalem
Imran Mahrukh
Rice Danielle B.
Azar Marleine
Chiovitti Matthew J.
Saadat Nazanin
Riehm Kira E.
Boruff Jill T.
Ioannidis John P. A.
Cuijpers Pim
Gilbody Simon
Kloda Lorie A.
Patten Scott B.
Shrier Ian
Ziegelstein Roy C.
Comeau Liane
Mitchell Nicholas D.
Tonelli Marcello
Vigod Simone N.
Aceti Franca
Barnes Jacqueline
Bavle Amar D.
Kozinszky Zoltán
Töreki Annamária
et al
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2021
Sorozat:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH 30 No. 1
Tárgyszavak:
doi:10.1002/mpr.1860

mtmt:31702176
Online Access:http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/30081
LEADER 03333nab a2200601 i 4500
001 publ30081
005 20240409084454.0
008 240409s2021 hu o 0|| eng d
022 |a 1049-8931 
024 7 |a 10.1002/mpr.1860  |2 doi 
024 7 |a 31702176  |2 mtmt 
040 |a SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium  |b hun 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Lyubenova Anita 
245 1 0 |a Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification   |h [elektronikus dokumentum] :  |b Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis /  |c  Lyubenova Anita 
260 |c 2021 
300 |a 13 
490 0 |a INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH  |v 30 No. 1 
520 3 |a Objectives Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in individual studies. Methods We analyzed datasets that compared EPDS scores to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) major depression status. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compare prevalence with EPDS cutoffs versus the SCID. Results Seven thousand three hundred and fifteen participants (1017 SCID major depression) from 29 primary studies were included. For EPDS cutoffs used to estimate prevalence in recent studies (>= 9 to >= 14), pooled prevalence estimates ranged from 27.8% (95% CI: 22.0%-34.5%) for EPDS >= 9 to 9.0% (95% CI: 6.8%-11.9%) for EPDS >= 14; pooled SCID major depression prevalence was 9.0% (95% CI: 6.5%-12.3%). EPDS >= 14 provided pooled prevalence closest to SCID-based prevalence but differed from SCID prevalence in individual studies by a mean absolute difference of 5.1% (95% prediction interval: -13.7%, 12.3%). Conclusion EPDS >= 14 approximated SCID-based prevalence overall, but considerable heterogeneity in individual studies is a barrier to using it for prevalence estimation. 
650 4 |a Klinikai orvostan 
700 0 1 |a Neupane Dipika  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Levis Brooke  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Wu Yin  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Sun Ying  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a He Chen  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Krishnan Ankur  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Bhandari Parash M.  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Negeri Zelalem  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Imran Mahrukh  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Rice Danielle B.  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Azar Marleine  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Chiovitti Matthew J.  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Saadat Nazanin  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Riehm Kira E.  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Boruff Jill T.  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Ioannidis John P. A.  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Cuijpers Pim  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Gilbody Simon  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Kloda Lorie A.  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Patten Scott B.  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Shrier Ian  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Ziegelstein Roy C.  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Comeau Liane  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Mitchell Nicholas D.  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Tonelli Marcello  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Vigod Simone N.  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Aceti Franca  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Barnes Jacqueline  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Bavle Amar D.  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Kozinszky Zoltán  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Töreki Annamária  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a et al.  |e aut 
856 4 0 |u http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/30081/3/31702176_megjelent.pdf  |z Dokumentum-elérés