Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis /
Objectives Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in individual studies. Methods...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerzők: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Cikk |
| Megjelent: |
2021
|
| Sorozat: | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
30 No. 1 |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| doi: | 10.1002/mpr.1860 |
| mtmt: | 31702176 |
| Online Access: | http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/30081 |
| LEADER | 03333nab a2200601 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | publ30081 | ||
| 005 | 20240409084454.0 | ||
| 008 | 240409s2021 hu o 0|| eng d | ||
| 022 | |a 1049-8931 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/mpr.1860 |2 doi | |
| 024 | 7 | |a 31702176 |2 mtmt | |
| 040 | |a SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium |b hun | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lyubenova Anita | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification |h [elektronikus dokumentum] : |b Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis / |c Lyubenova Anita |
| 260 | |c 2021 | ||
| 300 | |a 13 | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH |v 30 No. 1 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a Objectives Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in individual studies. Methods We analyzed datasets that compared EPDS scores to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) major depression status. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compare prevalence with EPDS cutoffs versus the SCID. Results Seven thousand three hundred and fifteen participants (1017 SCID major depression) from 29 primary studies were included. For EPDS cutoffs used to estimate prevalence in recent studies (>= 9 to >= 14), pooled prevalence estimates ranged from 27.8% (95% CI: 22.0%-34.5%) for EPDS >= 9 to 9.0% (95% CI: 6.8%-11.9%) for EPDS >= 14; pooled SCID major depression prevalence was 9.0% (95% CI: 6.5%-12.3%). EPDS >= 14 provided pooled prevalence closest to SCID-based prevalence but differed from SCID prevalence in individual studies by a mean absolute difference of 5.1% (95% prediction interval: -13.7%, 12.3%). Conclusion EPDS >= 14 approximated SCID-based prevalence overall, but considerable heterogeneity in individual studies is a barrier to using it for prevalence estimation. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Klinikai orvostan | |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Neupane Dipika |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Levis Brooke |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Wu Yin |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Sun Ying |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a He Chen |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Krishnan Ankur |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Bhandari Parash M. |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Negeri Zelalem |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Imran Mahrukh |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Rice Danielle B. |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Azar Marleine |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Chiovitti Matthew J. |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Saadat Nazanin |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Riehm Kira E. |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Boruff Jill T. |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Ioannidis John P. A. |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Cuijpers Pim |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Gilbody Simon |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Kloda Lorie A. |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Patten Scott B. |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Shrier Ian |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Ziegelstein Roy C. |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Comeau Liane |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Mitchell Nicholas D. |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Tonelli Marcello |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Vigod Simone N. |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Aceti Franca |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Barnes Jacqueline |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Bavle Amar D. |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Kozinszky Zoltán |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Töreki Annamária |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a et al. |e aut |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/30081/3/31702176_megjelent.pdf |z Dokumentum-elérés |