Validation of CT doses of SPECT/CT and PET/CT hybrid devices lessons learned /
Validation of CT doses of SPECT/CT and PET/CT hybrid devices: lessons learned Sera, Terez; Porubszky, Tamas; Papos, Miklos; Elek, Richard; Besenyi, Zsuzsanna; Gion, Katalin; Bartha, Andras; Pellet, Sandor; Pavics, Laszlo Abstract The aim of the study was to check the validity of computed tomographic...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerzők: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Cikk |
| Megjelent: |
2014
|
| Sorozat: | NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
35 No. 5 |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| doi: | 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000087 |
| mtmt: | 2584888 |
| Online Access: | http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/24198 |
| LEADER | 02858nab a2200325 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | publ24198 | ||
| 005 | 20220422153733.0 | ||
| 008 | 220422s2014 hu o 0|| Angol d | ||
| 022 | |a 0143-3636 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000087 |2 doi | |
| 024 | 7 | |a 2584888 |2 mtmt | |
| 040 | |a SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium |b hun | ||
| 041 | |a Angol | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Séra Teréz Emese | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Validation of CT doses of SPECT/CT and PET/CT hybrid devices |h [elektronikus dokumentum] : |b lessons learned / |c Séra Teréz Emese |
| 260 | |c 2014 | ||
| 300 | |a 534-538 | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS |v 35 No. 5 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a Validation of CT doses of SPECT/CT and PET/CT hybrid devices: lessons learned Sera, Terez; Porubszky, Tamas; Papos, Miklos; Elek, Richard; Besenyi, Zsuzsanna; Gion, Katalin; Bartha, Andras; Pellet, Sandor; Pavics, Laszlo Abstract The aim of the study was to check the validity of computed tomographic (CT) doses exhibited by SPECT/CT and PET/CT hybrid devices. Dose measurements were taken from four SPECT/CT and four PET/CT cameras commercially available from different manufacturers. A calibrated ionization chamber was placed in whole-body or head phantoms for the acquisition of CT images with clinically used parameters. Computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) values were calculated according to the IEC 60601-2-44:1999 formula. The measured CTDIvol doses were compared with those preprogrammed by the manufacturer. In the case of the whole-body phantom, the differences between the measured and displayed values varied between −31 and +24% [European document RP162 (2012) sets up the limit for acceptance criterion as ±20%]. The head phantom data showed either an agreement between −10 and +24%, or an underestimation by two-fold. The latter seemed to be because, while preprogramming the doses, the manufacturer had used the whole-body phantom instead of a proper head phantom. The results of the work demonstrate the need for individual dosimetric calibration of every single X-ray tube. Dosimetric checks should be included in the regular quality control programmes of the SPECT/CT and PET/CT devices. Special attention should be paid to head-and-neck and paediatric protocols, in which the use of a head phantom is recommended for dose calibration. © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Általános orvostudomány | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Klinikai orvostan | |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Porubszky Tamás |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Papós Miklós |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Elek Richárd |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Besenyi Zsuzsanna |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 2 | |a Becsyné Gion Katalin |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 2 | |a Bartha András |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 2 | |a Pellet Sándor |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 2 | |a Pávics László |e aut |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/24198/1/2584888Validation_of_CT_doses_of_SPECT_CT_and_PET_CT.13.pdf |z Dokumentum-elérés |