Fair use teszt a Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith döntés után - nem vész el, csak átalakul?

In 2023, the United States Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited decision in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Lynn Goldsmith, finding that the licensing of the orange-coloured image of the musician Prince by Andy Warhol, based on Ms Goldsmith's original photograph and printed on the cover of Vani...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerző: Mezei Péter
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: Szegedi Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar Szeged 2024
Sorozat:Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : forum : acta juridica et politica 14 No. 2
Kulcsszavak:Jogvita
Tárgyszavak:
Online Access:http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/85287
LEADER 01918nab a2200229 i 4500
001 acta85287
005 20240829130956.0
008 240829s2024 hu o 000 hun d
022 |a 2063-2525 
040 |a SZTE Egyetemi Kiadványok Repozitórium  |b hun 
041 |a hun 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Mezei Péter 
245 1 0 |a Fair use teszt a Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith döntés után - nem vész el, csak átalakul?  |h [elektronikus dokumentum] /  |c  Mezei Péter 
260 |a Szegedi Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar  |b Szeged  |c 2024 
300 |a 123-132 
490 0 |a Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : forum : acta juridica et politica  |v 14 No. 2 
520 3 |a In 2023, the United States Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited decision in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Lynn Goldsmith, finding that the licensing of the orange-coloured image of the musician Prince by Andy Warhol, based on Ms Goldsmith's original photograph and printed on the cover of Vanity Fair, which commemorated Prince, did not constitute fair use of that source work. Although the outcome of the case did not entirely surprise copyright aficionados, they were quite taken aback by the wording of the majority opinion. It explicitly narrowed the scope of the transformative test under the first factor of the fair use doctrine. Transformativeness was the key building block of the fair use applicant defence, so the Supreme Court’s decision may have the potential to change artists’ strategies in the short term. This paper summarizes the procedural history and key findings of the decision, questions its future implications, and discusses how the decision may play into the recent challenges to copyright posed by artificial intelligence. 
650 4 |a Társadalomtudományok 
650 4 |a Jogtudomány 
695 |a Jogvita 
856 4 0 |u http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/85287/1/juridpol_forum_014_002_123-132.pdf  |z Dokumentum-elérés