Bocskai István példája a 19-20. század kritikus korszakaiban

The goal of this study is to give an overview of the figure of István Bocskai, the prince of Transylvania in the public eye in three critical periods of the 19th and 20th centuries, particularly in political thought. He is mentioned often during difficult times, while before and after these periods...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerző: László Andor
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2023
Sorozat:Aetas 38 No. 3
Kulcsszavak:Magyarország története - 19-20. sz.
Tárgyszavak:
doi:10.14232/aetas.2023.3.5-38

Online Access:http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/84564
LEADER 02391nab a2200241 i 4500
001 acta84564
005 20240314152730.0
008 240314s2023 hu o 0|| hun d
022 |a 0237-7934 
024 7 |a 10.14232/aetas.2023.3.5-38  |2 doi 
040 |a SZTE Egyetemi Kiadványok Repozitórium  |b hun 
041 |a hun 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a László Andor 
245 1 0 |a Bocskai István példája a 19-20. század kritikus korszakaiban  |h [elektronikus dokumentum] /  |c  László Andor 
260 |c 2023 
300 |a 5-38 
490 0 |a Aetas  |v 38 No. 3 
520 3 |a The goal of this study is to give an overview of the figure of István Bocskai, the prince of Transylvania in the public eye in three critical periods of the 19th and 20th centuries, particularly in political thought. He is mentioned often during difficult times, while before and after these periods he is referenced much less frequently. The experience of the Revolution of 1848–1849 constituted an emotional basis for the formation of the Hungarian national identity, and the previous struggles of the Hungarian Estates were seen as parallels. The contemporaries saw a connection between the glorious period of the 17th century and their own times. This connection elevated Bocskai’s revolution to being seen as one of the great chapters of Hungarian history, and the prince became a member of the national pantheon. During the crisis following World War I, and later around World War II, different considerations gained importance, and the prince’s image became much more multifaceted. However, Bocskai still wasn’t a divisive personality, he was seen as a great politician and freedom fighter. Every political faction and ideology considered him an example to be followed, and found something among his values, achievements or deeds that fit their current message. It can be seen that the meaning of the past changes constantly, and different sources of remembrance paint a confusingly varied picture of Bocskai, who is constantly “repositioned” in public memory, but the role of history in politics doesn’t change: it underlines and authenticates contemporary messages. 
650 4 |a Bölcsészettudományok 
650 4 |a Történettudomány és régészet 
695 |a Magyarország története - 19-20. sz. 
856 4 0 |u http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/84564/1/aetas_2023_003_005-038.pdf  |z Dokumentum-elérés