Egyes (magán)jogi elvek egymás közti viszonyáról

Summing up the thesis of the study, we can lay down the following facts: The jurisprudence can be lawful, consequent in case of the scantiness of the legislation, if it fills the requirements of the principals underlying the constitution. If the principals collide, and the hierarchy doesn't giv...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerző: Bíró György
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: Szegedi Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Karának tudományos bizottsága Szeged 2007
Sorozat:Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : acta juridica et politica 69 No. 1-48
Kulcsszavak:Magánjog
Tárgyszavak:
Online Access:http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/7316
LEADER 02847nab a2200229 i 4500
001 acta7316
005 20231129154136.0
008 161015s2007 hu o 0|| hun d
022 |a 0324-6523 
040 |a SZTE Egyetemi Kiadványok Repozitórium  |b hun 
041 |a hun 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Bíró György 
245 1 0 |a Egyes (magán)jogi elvek egymás közti viszonyáról  |h [elektronikus dokumentum] /  |c  Bíró György 
260 |a Szegedi Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Karának tudományos bizottsága  |b Szeged  |c 2007 
300 |a 57-78 
490 0 |a Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : acta juridica et politica  |v 69 No. 1-48 
520 3 |a Summing up the thesis of the study, we can lay down the following facts: The jurisprudence can be lawful, consequent in case of the scantiness of the legislation, if it fills the requirements of the principals underlying the constitution. If the principals collide, and the hierarchy doesn't give explicit arrangement, then we should use the principal of "the least bad", especially in the jurisprudence. If the subsidiary principal contravenes a principal of the legal system or a branch of the law, the norm control can be applicable. The trio of principals of the reasonableness, justness, legal security must exist all of the acts of the legislation and jurisprudence. Only the purchaser in good faith receives a share of the increased defence, according to the requirements of the safety of the trade. There isn't a transition between the good faith and the bad faith; ill-deemer, who doesn't know, or after due consideration doesn't know, that the apparent condition departs from the lawful reality. The authenticity is a principal of the register of the title deeds, a subsidiary principle, which serves the safety of the trade, as a rebuttable presumption. The short term of claim to the cancellation is disquieting from the point of view of the hierarchy of the law. — The claim to the rectification is a property claim, and the enforcement of this claim isn't bound to deadline, because it isn't become void. — The non-existent contract is identifiable only in the point of view of the legal consequence with the invalidity, in the concept not, because there isn't consensus between the signatory. — If the court made a mistake by the estimation of the good faith, the owner has a real action and a contractual claim too. The primary, that the court has to get to a consistent attitude by the alternative establishment of the good faith or the bad faith. Someone's attitude is inadequate to the principal of good faith, if there is a doubt in connection with the circumstances of the purchase. 
650 4 |a Társadalomtudományok 
650 4 |a Jogtudomány 
695 |a Magánjog 
856 4 0 |u http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/7316/1/juridpol_069_057-078.pdf  |z Dokumentum-elérés