Jog és irodalom az előkérdések tárgyalása /

This study seeks to offer a short introduction to contemporary law and literature studies. As part of the jurisprudential scenery of our days the law and humanities movement - including law and literature - shares alike in its „risks and possibilities". Theoretical knowledge about law has becom...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerző: Nagy Tamás
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: Szegedi Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Karának tudományos bizottsága Szeged 2005
Sorozat:Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : acta juridica et politica 67 No. 15
Kulcsszavak:Jogtudomány
Tárgyszavak:
Online Access:http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/7280
LEADER 02529nab a2200229 i 4500
001 acta7280
005 20231205132543.0
008 161015s2005 hu o 0|| hun d
022 |a 0324-6523 
040 |a SZTE Egyetemi Kiadványok Repozitórium  |b hun 
041 |a hun 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Nagy Tamás 
245 1 0 |a Jog és irodalom   |h [elektronikus dokumentum] :  |b az előkérdések tárgyalása /  |c  Nagy Tamás 
260 |a Szegedi Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Karának tudományos bizottsága  |b Szeged  |c 2005 
300 |a 1-42 
490 0 |a Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : acta juridica et politica  |v 67 No. 15 
520 3 |a This study seeks to offer a short introduction to contemporary law and literature studies. As part of the jurisprudential scenery of our days the law and humanities movement - including law and literature - shares alike in its „risks and possibilities". Theoretical knowledge about law has become rather destabilized over the last three decades. Nowadays any form of legal scholarship must face serious metatheoretical issues. First of all: how to define jurisprudence? What is its valid canon? What does count as mainstream and what as outsider jurisprudence? What are the evaluation standards that all theories must meet? What is the condition and the point of jurisprudential activity? Furthermore (as to the specific problems of law and literature): how inderdisciplinary legal scholarship is possible? How to answer the question whether law is literature or narrative or has Pierre Schlag put it right when saying that „to try to understand American law as a kind of literature is a bit like trying to apprehend Soviet Communism as a movement dedicated to sponsoring socialist realism"? Even more questions arise when one tries to analyse law and literature as a kind of modern reincarnation of the „configuration of law and letters" in American culture (to borrow Robert Ferguson's term). Seen as part of a jurisprudential history the account of law and literature examinations involves issues such as whether one can describe the past of legal theory objectively or (according to contemporary historiography) is it just another fiction like literature itself? Is there a true story? These are the questions this study asks in the hope of some answers - if there are any at all. 
650 4 |a Társadalomtudományok 
650 4 |a Jogtudomány 
695 |a Jogtudomány 
856 4 0 |u http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/7280/1/juridpol_067_fasc_015_001-042.pdf  |z Dokumentum-elérés