Árvaszékek működése a dualizmus korában

Even for the feudal state, supervising underage orphans and safeguarding their wealth were important tasks. City states organised public guardian authorities which, after the edict of Maria Theresa, fell under the supervision of the Viceroy Council. After the Revolution of 1848 was crushed, during t...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerző: Homoki-Nagy Mária
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2020
Sorozat:Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : forum : acta juridica et politica 10 No. 3
Kulcsszavak:Gyámhatóság története - Magyarország - 19. sz.
Tárgyszavak:
Online Access:http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/72798
Leíró adatok
Tartalmi kivonat:Even for the feudal state, supervising underage orphans and safeguarding their wealth were important tasks. City states organised public guardian authorities which, after the edict of Maria Theresa, fell under the supervision of the Viceroy Council. After the Revolution of 1848 was crushed, during the time of neoabsolutism, dispatching a guardian for the orphans fell under the jurisdiction of the country-courts, not to mention their supervision, the verification of accounts and settling the disputes in connection to the due inheritance for the orphans within the framework of succession proceedings. After the Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867, a jurisdictional dispute arose over the cases in the matter of orphans between the legal authorities and the royal country-courts. According to long-standing traditions, it was mandatory for legal authorities to organise public guardian authorities, to elect the president and the assessors of the public guardian authorities and to prepare the regulations of the operation of the public guardian authorities. However, succession proceedings of the mass of orphans remained within the jurisdiction of the country-courts, yet the supervision of assigned guardians was still shared by the jurisdiction of the public guardian authorities and the country-courts. In everyday practices, at least according to archival sources, the conflicts that resulted from these jurisdictional disputes urged the legislators to regulate the matters in connection to wardship and guardianship in a separate act in 1877, due to the lack of a unified legal code for civil law.
Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők:39-63
ISSN:2063-2525