A Római Birodalom jellemzése II. Agrippa beszédében - Flavius Iosephus A zsidó háború II. 16.4. (345-401) /

Flavius Iosephus inserted an advisory speech into the second book of his Jewish War. The long suasoria was harangued by Marcus Julius Agrippa II, the client king of Judea, who pretended to dissuade his fellow-countrymen from launching a war against the occupying Roman forces. He tried to convince th...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerző: Grüll Tibor
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2020
Sorozat:Aetas 35 No. 2
Kulcsszavak:Római birodalom története - 1. sz.
Tárgyszavak:
Online Access:http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/71916
LEADER 02276nab a2200217 i 4500
001 acta71916
005 20230327113922.0
008 210204s2020 hu o 0|| hun d
022 |a 0237-7934 
040 |a SZTE Egyetemi Kiadványok Repozitórium  |b hun 
041 |a hun 
100 1 |a Grüll Tibor 
245 1 2 |a A Római Birodalom jellemzése II. Agrippa beszédében - Flavius Iosephus  |h [elektronikus dokumentum] :  |b A zsidó háború II. 16.4. (345-401) /  |c  Grüll Tibor 
260 |c 2020 
300 |a 104-125 
490 0 |a Aetas  |v 35 No. 2 
520 3 |a Flavius Iosephus inserted an advisory speech into the second book of his Jewish War. The long suasoria was harangued by Marcus Julius Agrippa II, the client king of Judea, who pretended to dissuade his fellow-countrymen from launching a war against the occupying Roman forces. He tried to convince the Jews that a mutiny against Rome is absolutely hopeless and impossible. The major part of his argumentation is an overview of the Roman Empire in AD 66: he takes into account the nine macro-regions of the imperium Romanum from East to West (Asia Minor, Anatolia, Bosporus; Thrace; Dalmatia; Gaul; Spain; Germany; Britain; Africa; Egypt) from different point of views: e.g. size of population, economic strength, natural protection etc. Josephus/Agrippa aimed to demonstrate that Rome is invincible, she practically rules the whole world, and the nations subjugated to her power, willingly obey. This rose-tinted view, of course, was deliberately distorted and far from truth. Nevertheless, in Agrippa’s speech we do not find the usual topics of laus imperii, therefore this picture of the Roman Empire can be certainly described as more ‘realistic’ than ‘optimistic’. For example, Iosephus/Agrippa openly says that the nations conquered by the Romans commuted their former freedom to slavery. Thus, he does not deny that Rome enslaves the nations, all he wants is to persuade the Jews that this is not only a ‘historical necessity’, but it is in accordance with the plan of God. 
650 4 |a Bölcsészettudományok 
650 4 |a Történettudomány és régészet 
695 |a Római birodalom története - 1. sz. 
856 4 0 |u http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/71916/1/aetas_2020_002_104-125.pdf  |z Dokumentum-elérés