Comparison of pipette and laser diffraction methods in determining the granulometric content of fluvial sediment samples

Nowadays there is a growing demand for rapid and accurate determination of grain size distribution. The conventional pipette method is time-consuming and provides less detailed data compared to recently introduced methods. However, in Hungarian practice the pipette method is still considered to be t...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerzők: Kun Ágnes
Katona Orsolya
Sipos György
Barta Károly
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2013
Sorozat:Journal of environmental geography 6 No. 3-4
Kulcsszavak:Üledék - mintavétel
Tárgyszavak:
Online Access:http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/30629
LEADER 02052nab a2200253 i 4500
001 acta30629
005 20220627115432.0
008 161017s2013 hu o 0|| eng d
022 |a 2060-3274 
040 |a SZTE Egyetemi Kiadványok Repozitórium  |b hun 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Kun Ágnes 
245 1 0 |a Comparison of pipette and laser diffraction methods in determining the granulometric content of fluvial sediment samples  |h [elektronikus dokumentum] /  |c  Kun Ágnes 
260 |c 2013 
300 |a 49-54 
490 0 |a Journal of environmental geography  |v 6 No. 3-4 
520 3 |a Nowadays there is a growing demand for rapid and accurate determination of grain size distribution. The conventional pipette method is time-consuming and provides less detailed data compared to recently introduced methods. However, in Hungarian practice the pipette method is still considered to be the standard one, as there are a long series of measurements, and grain size thresholds used in sedimentology and soil sciences are based on this approach. The aim of our research was to determine the comparability of the laser diffraction method (LDM) with the conventional pipette method (PM), in order to investigate the controversial question on the interchangeability of the two methods. Based on our measurements on some representative fluvial sediment samples, we found that the largest difference in results can be expected in the silty grain size range. However if the main fractions (clay, silt, sand) are considered the methods provided similar very results, and correlation factors were above 0.92. In all, the LDM has a clear advantage because of its speed, reproducibility and fewer possibilities for operator failure. 
650 4 |a Természettudományok 
650 4 |a Föld- és kapcsolódó környezettudományok 
695 |a Üledék - mintavétel 
700 0 1 |a Katona Orsolya  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Sipos György  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Barta Károly  |e aut 
856 4 0 |u http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/30629/1/journal_geo_006_003_004_049-054.pdf  |z Dokumentum-elérés