Néhány gondolat Zermegh János Commentariusáról
The Commentarius of János Zermegh embraces the events in Hungary from the battle of Mohács to the death of János Szapolyai. Contrary to former opinions, Pongrác Sörös proved already in 1907 that the text had without doubt been written after 1566, because Zermegh mentions the death of Zrínyi and the...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Cikk |
| Megjelent: |
2011
|
| Sorozat: | Acta historiae litterarum hungaricarum
30 |
| Kulcsszavak: | Irodalomtudomány |
| Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/1115 |
| LEADER | 01621nab a2200193 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | acta1115 | ||
| 005 | 20210420093244.0 | ||
| 008 | 161015s2011 hu o 0|| hun d | ||
| 022 | |a 0586-3708 | ||
| 040 | |a SZTE Egyetemi Kiadványok Repozitórium |b hun | ||
| 041 | |a hun | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kasza Péter | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Néhány gondolat Zermegh János Commentariusáról |h [elektronikus dokumentum] / |c Kasza Péter |
| 260 | |c 2011 | ||
| 300 | |a 242-248 | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Acta historiae litterarum hungaricarum |v 30 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a The Commentarius of János Zermegh embraces the events in Hungary from the battle of Mohács to the death of János Szapolyai. Contrary to former opinions, Pongrác Sörös proved already in 1907 that the text had without doubt been written after 1566, because Zermegh mentions the death of Zrínyi and the fall of Szigetvár, but he did not try to explain why Zermegh had finished his memoirs with the year 1540. This may be explained by the fact that Zermegh had been encouraged to write his work by Simon Forgách, while the historiographer Ferenc Forgách, the brother of Simon Forgách, started his own text with the aforementioned year 1540 and the death of János Szapolyai. Nevertheless, it is also possible that the Commentarius of Zermegh had not been written directly for Ferenc Forgách, who in fact never used this text, but rather for the Italian humanist, Gian Michele Bruto, who exploited the works of both Forgách and Zernegh as a source for his own historical opus. | |
| 695 | |a Irodalomtudomány | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/1115/1/hist_litt_hung_030_242-248.pdf |z Dokumentum-elérés |